{"id":8979,"date":"2019-06-03T10:57:50","date_gmt":"2019-06-03T08:57:50","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.phytocontrol.com\/?p=8979"},"modified":"2019-06-03T10:57:50","modified_gmt":"2019-06-03T08:57:50","slug":"efsa-report-2017-veterinary-medicinal-product-residues-and-other-substances","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.phytocontrol.com\/en\/regulatory-watch\/efsa-report-2017-veterinary-medicinal-product-residues-and-other-substances\/","title":{"rendered":"EFSA Report 2017 veterinary medicinal product residues and other substances."},"content":{"rendered":"<div class=\"hover_box\"><div class=\"hover_box_wrapper\"><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"scale-with-grid visible_photo\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/06\/Aiguille-viande-400-700.jpg\" alt=\"EFSA Report 2017 veterinary medicinal product residues and other substances.\" width=\"\" height=\"\"\/><img decoding=\"async\" class=\"scale-with-grid hidden_photo\" src=\"\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/03\/actu_publication-rasff-2016_02.jpg\" alt=\"EFSA Report 2017 veterinary medicinal product residues and other substances.\" width=\"\" height=\"\"\/><\/div><\/div>\n\n<p>&nbsp;<\/p>\n<p>EFSA has published its <a href=\"https:\/\/efsa.onlinelibrary.wiley.com\/doi\/epdf\/10.2903\/sp.efsa.2019.EN-1578\">report on 2017<\/a> results from the monitoring of veterinary medicinal product residues and other substances in live animals and animal products.<\/p>\n<p>A total of 708 880 samples were checked by 28 Member States. The non-compliance rate for 2017 was 0.35%, comparable to the previous 10 years (0.25% &#8211; 0.37%).<\/p>\n<p>The presence of unauthorised substances and residues of veterinary medicinal products in food is a risk factor for public health.<\/p>\n<p>Three main European texts govern the rules applicable to veterinary residues and prohibited substances:<br \/>\n&#8211; Regulation (EU) No 37\/2010establishes\u00a0 maximum\u00a0 limits\u00a0 for residues\u00a0 of\u00a0 veterinary\u00a0 medicinal\u00a0 products\u00a0 in\u00a0 food-producing\u00a0 animals\u00a0 and\u00a0 animal\u00a0 products.<br \/>\n&#8211; Regulation No 396\/2005 sets maximum residue limits for pesticides in food and feed of plant and animal origin.<br \/>\n&#8211; Directive 96\/23\/EC lays down measures to monitor certain substances and their residues, mainly veterinary medicinal products, in live animals and animals products.<\/p>\n<p>The products analysed in 2017 are as follows: bovines, pigs, sheep and goats, horses, poultry, rabbits, farmed game, wild game, aquaculture, milk, eggs and honey.<\/p>\n<p>For group A:<br \/>\n&#8211; No\u00a0 non-compliant\u00a0 samples\u00a0 were\u00a0 reported\u00a0 for\u00a0 stilbenes\u00a0 and\u00a0 derivatives\u00a0 (A1).<br \/>\n&#8211; For antithyroid agents (A2), there were 0.42% non-compliant samples, all for thiouracil, most likely due to feeding diets rich in cruciferous plants.<br \/>\n&#8211; In the group of steroids (A3), non-compliant samples (all for anabolic steroids) were found in bovines (0.28%), pigs (0.11%) and sheep and goats (5.77 %). For corticosteroids,\u00a0\u00a0 non-compliant\u00a0\u00a0 results\u00a0\u00a0 for\u00a0\u00a0 authorised\u00a0\u00a0 substances\u00a0\u00a0 were\u00a0\u00a0 reported\u00a0\u00a0 under\u00a0\u00a0 \u2018other pharmacologically active substances\u2019 (B2f).<br \/>\n&#8211; In the group of resorcylic acid lactones (A4), 0.17% of the samples were non-compliant for zearalanone and derivatives; the non-compliant samples were found in\u00a0 bovines\u00a0 (0.29%),\u00a0 sheep\u00a0 and\u00a0 goats\u00a0 (1.23%)\u00a0 and\u00a0 horses\u00a0 (0.97%).<br \/>\n&#8211; For\u00a0 beta-agonists\u00a0 (A5),\u00a0 there were 0.02% non-compliant samples in total, all reported for bovines.<br \/>\n&#8211; Prohibited substances (A6) were found in 0.03% of samples. Substances identified were. The substances identified were chloramphenicol, nitroimidazoles and nitrofurans.<\/p>\n<p>For group B:<br \/>\n&#8211; For antibacterials (B1), 0.26% of samples were non-compliant. The highest frequency of non-compliant samples for antibacterial agents was observed in honey (0.83%)<br \/>\n&#8211; In group B2 (other veterinary drugs), the highest proportion of non-compliant samples was found for NSAIDs (non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs) (0.27%). Non-compliant samples\u00a0 were\u00a0 reported\u00a0 across\u00a0 the\u00a0 different\u00a0 species\u00a0 as\u00a0 follows;\u00a0 0.05%\u00a0 for\u00a0 bovines,\u00a0 0.06%\u00a0 for\u00a0 sheep and\u00a0 goats,\u00a0 0.66%\u00a0 for\u00a0 horses,\u00a0 0.06%\u00a0 for \u00a0pigs\u00a0 and\u00a0 0.96% for milk.<br \/>\n&#8211; In Group B3 (other substances and environmental contaminants), cadmium, lead, mercury and copper had the highest overall percentage of non-compliant samples (4.69%).<\/p>\n<p>Please note that our laboratory has developed an innovative method for the analysis of veterinary medicinal product residues on a number of chemical families unrivalled in France.<\/p>\n<p>The Phytocontrol laboratory is thus able to detect and quantify a large list of veterinary medicinal product residues using a high-performance HPLC-QTOF technique, supplemented with LC-MS\/MS, in a package that also includes Chloramphenicol.<\/p>\n<p>For any technical, pricing or regulatory information, do not hesitate to contact us.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>&nbsp; EFSA has published its report on 2017 results from the monitoring of veterinary medicinal product residues and other substances in live animals and animal products.<span class=\"excerpt-hellip\"> [\u2026]<\/span><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":8,"featured_media":6831,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[181],"tags":[],"yst_prominent_words":[],"class_list":["post-8979","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-regulatory-watch"],"acf":[],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8979","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/8"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=8979"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/8979\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media\/6831"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=8979"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=8979"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=8979"},{"taxonomy":"yst_prominent_words","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.phytocontrol.com\/en\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/yst_prominent_words?post=8979"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}